|
UNIQUE POLITICAL BOUNDARIES
Cotabato City
is a chartered City geographically surrounded by the Province of
Maguindanao that belongs to the Autonomous Region of Muslim
Mindanao (ARMM). Yet the City is considered part of Region XII,
not of ARMM. Based on the 2001 Plebiscite, ARMM would also
include the provinces of Lanao del Sur (located north of
Maguindanao), Tawi Tawi, Sulu and Basilan, with Marawi as the
lone City of the Region. On the other hand, Region XII, as
provided under Executive Order No. 36 issued on September 2001,
includes the provinces of North Cotabato, South Cotabato
Saranggani, Sultan Kudarat and the cities of Cotabato, General
Santos, Kidapawan, Koronadal, and Tacurong.
This unusual
situation makes local governance a bit tricky and complicated
because of the influences of these two inherent administrative
and political bodies on the social, economic, and political
aspects of Cotabato City. The City has physical and economic
linkages with the surrounding towns of the Maguindanao Province.
These connections are further enhanced by the transport links
primarily through the port and the airport, which are both
located outside the City. In terms of planning procedures
mandated by the Local Government Code, the City’s development
plans would have to be integrated with that of Region XII, not
of ARMM. Already, there have been issues, like waste disposal
and water resource development, whose resolutions have been
constrained by territorial and jurisdictional difficulties.
Other issues
impact on the conduct of commerce. Businessmen could not expect
direct action by City officials on the alleged high fees and
double charges at the port, simply because it is beyond the
jurisdiction of the City. The same goes to securing LTO permits
and franchises on public transportation, which the traders have
to do twice – one with the City and one with the Maguindanao
province – in order to bring their goods to and from Cotabato
City.
The local
government’s efforts on peace and order are also affected.
Although many would say that there has been a decrease in the
frequency of crime and violence in the City, these are not
appreciated by outsiders who still equate the City with the
untoward incidents in the provinces of Maguindanao, North
Cotabato and South Cotabato, or even in other parts of Mindanao.
Thus, investors and travelers alike shy away from the City
because of this image problem. Efforts should be exerted by all
sectors in Cotabato City to mitigate this negative image. This
will be a key and a part of the development proposals for this
sector.
EXISTING GOVERNMENT MACHINERY
Cotabato City
is an independent component city of Maguindanao Province of the
Autonomous Region for Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) but the city is
administratively linked to Region XII. The City Government of
Cotabato is composed of twelve (12) functional offices with a
total of 1,014 workforces. It is composed of the following
offices under the direct supervision and administration of the
City Mayor.
- City
Treasury Office (CTO)
- City
Assessor’s Office (CAO)
- City
Planning and Development Office (CPDO)
- City
Civil Registry Office (CCRO)
-
Office on General Services (OGS)
- City
Budget Office (CBO)
- City
Accounting and Internal Audit Services (CAIAS)
-
Office for Legal Services (OLS)
-
Office on Health Services (OHS)
-
Office on Social Welfare and Development Services (OSWDS)
-
Office for Veterinary Services (OVS)
- City
Engineering Office (CEO)
The City
Administrator and the Secretary to the Mayor provides direct
staff functions to the City Mayor.
In terms of manpower, the Office of the City Mayor has the
biggest number of government workers making-up 18.93 % of the
total work force. Next is the Office General Services with a
total of 169 employees. The office with the least number of
personnel is the office on Legal Services with only 14
personnel.
As of December 31, 1999, the City Government of Cotabato has a
total working force of 1,014. By status of appointment,
eligibility and highest educational attainment.
Out of the 1,014 city government workers, officers and
officials, 64.30 (%) enjoy permanent status of employment, 30.86
(%) are casuals and 4.84% are elected. Government employees who
posses the desired eligibilities total to 621 or 61.24% while
393 or 38.75% do not posses the necessary / required
eligibility. Personnel who have completed college education make
- up 79.68%.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Basically,
local government functions deal with community basic social
services extension, public works and engineering, administrative
and legal services. Almost all offices dealing with such
functions are housed in the city hall. Three (3) offices and
three (3) divisions of the Office of the City Mayor however are
presently holding office at the old provincial capitol building
at P.C. Hill. Since the approval and implementation of the Local
Government Code of 1991 otherwise known as Republic Act 7160,
important administrative reforms and innovations are instituted
to provide better public services which aims towards a more
cohesive, integrated, specialized and responsive administrative
machinery, systems and processes. A proposed City Organizational
Structure (Annex A) is planned to be implemented in the next ten
years to specifically provide for services not yet present or
functional in the existing city government set-up is viewed as a
responsive effort on the part of the city government for the
promotion of a more productive and self-reliant community. Also,
the provision of the required manpower in the city government
structures provide for a more substantive participation of the
different units of the city government in the formulation,
implementation and monitoring of development plans, policies,
strategies and projects.
The local policy and law-making bodies at the local levels are
the Sangguniang Panlungsod for the city and the Sangguniang
Barangay for the 37 Barangays. Both bodies enact ordinances and
pass resolutions for their respective constituents. The
president of the Liga ng mga Barangays sits as member at the
Sangguniang Panlungsod to present proposals, recommendations and
seek early resolution of problems / issues affecting barangays.
As observed, there is a very close coordinative mechanisms
formed by these two local launching bodies.
Office spaces at the existing city hall are not adequate.
Presently, some divisions and units lack vital personnel
required in the performance of some functions. Specifically, the
CPDO lacks the needed manpower to effectively discharge its
functions and responsibilities while some offices have employees
with overlapping functions and sometimes overloading of
functions of some personnel.
EFFECTIVE LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION
Problems/Issues
- Lack
of responsive / forward organizational structure pursuant to
the LGC of 1991 (RA 7160);
-
in-appropriate organizational set-up to adequately meet the
administrative demands in the height of current trends and
development efforts;
- the
need for an immediate augmentation of government workers as
required under RA 7160;
- the
need to provide an effective and external coordination and
linkage between offices and central, regional, and
provincial levels of government for an effective delivery of
services;
- the
preparedness of the city government to cope with the
immediate demands of decentralization;
- the
need to provide adequate office spaces for each city
division / units there is an immediate need to accommodate
the city government workers in a more conducive and
functionally effective working environment;
- the
need to improve the administrative and managerial capability
of officials, officers and employees;
- to
further strengthen the city government’s capability in
planning and program / project implementation;
-
problem on local finances are usually in the form of
inadequate financial resources causes of which could be
traced to implementation of rules and regulations on
taxation, inadequate methods of collecting taxes, budgetary
maldistribution of finances and the inability to obtain
sources of funds for long-term budgetary commitments such as
capital investments.
- To
augment the present work force of the city treasurer’s
office to adequately perform its functions.
PLANNING ANG MONITORING BODIES
City Development Council (CDC) / Barangay Development
Council (BDC)/ Project Monitoring Committee
The City
Development Council of Cotabato City was created to serve as
the policy and planning body for the development of the area.
Executive Order No. 319 emphasizes the need to strengthen the
mechanism for coordinating the effort of the national and
local officials and non-governmental organizations to
accelerate economic and social growth and development at the
regional and local levels and the need for greater
participation from the private sector and non-governmental
organization in the development process. This same mandate
called for the reorganization and strengthening of the local
development councils (barangays & city) which shall assist
local legislative bodies in setting the direction of economic
and social developments and for coordinating efforts in both
levels of governance within their respective territorial
jurisdictions. The 37 barangays have their Barangay
Development Councils.
CITY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
-
Formulate long-term, medium-term, and annual
socio-economic development plans and policies
-
Formulate the medium-term and annual public investment
programs
-
Appraise and prioritize the socio-economic development
programs and projects
-
Formulate local investment incentives to promote the
inflow and direction of private investment capital
-
Coordinate, monitor and evaluate programs and projects,
and
-
Perform such other functions as may be provided for law or
competent authority.
BARANGAY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
-
Mobilize citizen’s participation in the local development
efforts
-
Identify programs and projects based on local requirements
-
Monitor and evaluate program/project implementation
-
Perform such other functions as may be provided for by law
or competent authority
-
These two levels of quasi legislative bodies perform
functions which require close coordination.
PROJECT MONITORING COMMITTEE
The City Project Monitoring Committee (PMC) was created by
the Honorable City Mayor through Executive Order No. 23
dated October 19, 1998 following the provisions of Executive
Order No. 93 which established the Regional Project
Monitoring and Evaluation System (RPMES).
Membership to the PMC include the DILG official assigned in
the city, three (3) NGO representatives and four (4) members
appointed by the City Mayor from among the five (5) nominees
of the City Development Council. Secretariat support is
provided by the City Planning and Development Office.
The scope of monitoring includes all foreign and nationally
– funded projects including development projects funded from
the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) share of LGUs or
supported by funds released directly to the city and
projects from locally – generated resources, which are
implemented within the city.
City Land Use Committee
The City Government of Cotabato has created and organized a
City Land Use Committee made up of an executive and
technical working group. The Executive Group is chaired by
the Honorable City Mayors and the members are the Regional
Directors of NEDA XII, DA XII, DAR, DOST, DTI, DOT, City
Superintendent of Schools, DENR, DPWH, HLURB and the
Regional Administrators of NSO XII. The Technical Working
Group is chaired by the city Planning & Development
Coordinator with members coming from the various
departments, technical representatives of line agencies and
NGOs. The City Land Use Committee, under the over-all
technical assistance of NEDA XII, performs the following:
A. Executive Group
-
Review the plan prepared by the TWG for consideration and
indorsement of the CDC
-
Ensure that the Land Use Plan prepared by the TWG is
consistent with the national policies, standards and
guideline
-
Ensure that plans are supportive of the objectives set
forth in the Urban Development and Housing act of 1992.
B.
Technical Working Group
-
Prepare/update the City Land Use Plan for the review of
the City Land Use Committee (Executive Level) and for the
approval and indorsement by the City Development Council;
-
Serve as technical clearing house and present alternative
options for consideration of executive level;
-
Conduct studies and researches related to land use and
physical planning;
-
Conduct monitoring and evaluation activities on the
implementation of the City’s land use plan;
- Act
as Liaison of the committee in assessing information from
his agency for physical planning.
Monitoring
The efficiency and effectiveness of government programs and
projects should be evaluated based on the availability of the
delivery machinery and to what extent these same programs and
projects alter existing conditions for the greater benefit of
the city’s population. An effective monitoring scheme
essentially considers the following concerns :
-
whether the implemented programs and projects are
reflective of the population’s aspiration
-
whether development policies have been closely followed
viz - a viz development programs / projects location
within the city;
-
institute a reporting system relative to the planned and
actual project;
-
collection of feedback data during implementation
Local Development Councils
The Local Development Councils (Barangay / City Development
Councils) are effective instruments for evaluating the
performance of development projects through its established
Local Monitoring System
City Chief Executive
A
monitoring or feedback system is only one of the mechanisms to
improve plan implementation. However, leadership is still the
key factor for its effective implementation. What makes the
leadership variable so crucial is its ability to act and react
on important critical inputs. Thus, it is the manipulative and
transforming quality of leadership that could determine the
administrative capability of implementing mechanisms. Aside
from the political will of the leadership through the City
Chief Executive to vigorously implement plans, programs, and
projects, vigilance of the citizenry in monitoring is very
important.
Plans / Programs Monitoring
Crucial to the planning and implementation process is the
conduct of monitoring to determine the effectiveness of the
project. Every implementing entity of the city government
shall install its own monitoring system to keep track on the
status and efficacy of the just completed project.
In order to pursue and carry on the implementation, a working
group should be recognized. This group shall be ad-hoc in
nature and only will be enforced for as long as they are
needed in the implementation. They are immediately dissolved
as soon as the projects are completed.
For each project and program identified, a working committee
shall take charge the prosecution of said project and program.
PLANS and IMPLEMENTATION
The crucial
stage vital to the development of the city is the implementation
of the formulated of programs and identified projects. To carry
the implementation of programs / projects, specific work groups,
task force, CLUC, etc. are organized. They can be ad hoc
elements of governmental agencies of different levels and may be
dissolved after the completion of the programs / projects they
are engaged in. The members of these different levels of
implementation groups shall come from agencies that will
implement or is implementing the project. The implementation
groups in the different areas of sectoral concerns shall
undertake the implementation of specific projects peculiar to
their mandate. These implementation groups (Task Force, CLUC,
IBRA, etc.) aside from their operational functions shall perform
the following :
-
prepare program / project proposals within its functional
area for consideration in the formulation of the five-year
development plan and annual investment plan
-
submit regular reports to the City Mayor through the CPDO
concerning the progress or status of implementation of
projec
-
provide statistical data to the local planning staff as may
be necessary if the revision or updating of the
Comprehensive Development Plans
-
advise the CPDO of operational or organizational problems
which arise in the course of project / program
implementation
Updating / Amending the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP)
and Zoning Ordinance (ZO)
Updating of
the CLUP is usually done after five (5) years from the date of
its approval. However, there are no legal limitations imposed on
the City Government to update its CLUP when there is an
immediate need for updating. Amendments introduced in the CLUP
within the plan period shall only be done upon the proper
recommendation of the CPDO after a series of public hearings
called for the purpose.
The amended part of the CLUP shall be incorporated only upon
approval of the S.P. after review and approval by the Regional
Land Use Committee (RLUC)
|